Clinical and Imaging Characteristics of Smear Negative Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients: A Comparative Study.

Background: Prevalence surveys in Ethiopia indicate smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis (SNPTB) taking the major share of the overall TB burden. It has also been a diagnostic dilemma worldwide leading to diagnostic delays and difficulty in monitoring treatment outcomes. This study determines and compares the clinical and imaging findings in SNPTB and smear positive PTB (SPPTB). Methodology. A case-control study was conducted on 313 PTB (173 SNPTB) patients. Data and sputum samples were collected from consented patients. Smear microscopy, GeneXpert, and culture analyses were performed on sputum samples. Data were analyzed using Stata version 17; a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 173 SNPTB patients, 42% were culture positive with discordances between test results reported by health facilities and Armauer Hansen Research Institute laboratory using concentrated smear microscopy. A previous history of TB and fewer cavitary lesions were significantly associated with SNPTB. Conclusions: Though overall clinical presentations of SNPTB patients resemble those seen in SPPTB patients, a prior history of TB was strongly associated with SNPTB. Subject to further investigations, the relatively higher discrepancies seen in TB diagnoses reflect the posed diagnostic challenges in SNPTB patients, as a higher proportion of these patients are also seen in Ethiopia.

Changes in plasma levels of endocrine hormones in lepromatous leprosy patients.

Background: Leprosy affects various endocrine glands and causes disorders in internal organs in addition to the skin and peripheral nerves. These disorders are often silent and remain undiagnosed or underreported. In particular, patterns of hormone changes during leprosy, especially in lepromatous leprosy (LL) patients, are often associated with dysregulation of different endocrine and sex hormones. The aim of this study was to assess changes in four endocrine hormones - namely cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), growth hormone (GH), and leptin - among LL patients compared with apparently healthy controls. Method: In total, 80 plasma samples were systematically retrieved from a biorepository at the Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), based on quality, adequacy of sample volume, and appropriateness of linked clinical and sociodemographic data. Forty of the samples were obtained from LL patients (cases) and the remaining 40 from apparently healthy controls. Enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) was used to quantify levels of DHEA, cortisol, GH, and leptin hormones in the plasma samples. Data were analyzed using non-parametric statistics and the Mann-Whitney U-test (GraphPad Prism version 7.01). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Plasma levels of cortisol concentration were significantly higher in LL cases (median = 111.4 ng/ml, range = 20.54-525.7) compared with healthy controls (median = 51.98 ng/ml, range = 3.805-328.4) (p = 0.003). Levels of GH and leptin were significantly lower in LL cases compared with healthy controls (median values for GH = 1.01 µIU/ml, range = 0.4625-86.82 and 2 µIU/ml, range = 0.5838-63.36, respectively (p = 0.022); median values for leptin = 891 pg/ml, range = 728.4-21816 and 5147 pg/ml, range = 730.4-52747, respectively (p < 0.0001)). There was an apparent reduction in the plasma levels of DHEA among LL cases compared with healthy controls (p = 0.297), although this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Alterations in levels of endocrine hormones seen in LL patients reflect clinical and immunological conditions during lepromatous leprosy. However, large-scale studies are warranted to determine how leprosy causes such alterations in hormones and the interplay between endocrine hormones and the immune system during leprosy disease.

Research ethics review practices: experiences of the Armauer Hansen Research Institute/All Africa Leprosy and Tuberculosis Rehabilitation and Training Center Ethics Review Committee, Ethiopia.

The need for ethics review committees (ERCs) is imperative in the conduct of research to ensure the protection of the rights, safety and well-being of research participants. However, the capacities of most ERCs in Africa are limited in terms of trained experts, competence, resources as well as standard operating procedures. The aim of this report is to share experiences of one of the local institutional ERCs, the Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI)/All Africa Leprosy and Tuberculosis Rehabilitation and Training Center (ALERT) Ethics Review Committee (AAERC), to other ERCs found in academic and research institutions in the Country. In this report, we used an empirical approach to review archived documents of the AAERC Secretariat to assess the Committee's strengths and weaknesses. The experiences of the AAERC in terms of its composition, routine work activities, learning practices and pitfalls that require general attention are summarized. In spite of this summary, the Committee strongly acknowledges the functions and roles of other ERCs in the Country. In addition, an independent assessment of the Committee's activity in general is warranted to evaluate its performance and further assess the level of awareness or oversights among researchers about the roles of ERCs.